![epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons](https://images.versus.io/objects/epson-perfection-v500-office.front.master.1576684641045.jpg)
It did a pretty good job, and I was sure (still am) that one with slightly more resolution (such as the 8800F) would provide for highly satisfactory results. About three years ago I used a CanoScan (far from top of the CanoScan range) to scan a few of my 35 mm B/W negatives. I have only scanned negatives a few times, in the past. I would have thought that these two scanners would be up against each other, and as such addressed by equipment review sites and journalists. I was hoping for a direct comparison between the two scanners perhaps even a link to an article/test comparing them. However, I believe that with custom scan settings on my V500 I can equal or exceed the Up till now, all of my film has been scanned by a service on Nikon 50. I am not having troubles with an orange mask on color My medium format scans using digital iceĪre taking about 5 minutes. I'm not sure why scans take so long for others. I'm still testing 35mm, but I think that for smaller print sizes-11x16Īnd smaller, a dedicated scanner for most people is simply unnecessary. In fact, with some sharpening, my 8x8 prints are theĮqual of the 9000. My initial scans of 35mm areĮxcellent, but it really excels at MF. I was surprised at how good a job the V500 is doing. I hadĬonvinced myself that I, too, was a flat bed snob, and that only a Nikon 9000 would do my Just yesterday I bought a V500, intending to try it and return it if it didn't perform. Sometimes I wonder if all the people that disparage flat bed scanners have actually used I am slightly blue/green colorblind, so on important stuff, I have my wife come and look before I print. Sometimes, the scans will come out with a color cast that you have to remove.
#Epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons software#
If you have never scanned film before, I should also let you know that, in my experience, negatives are hard to scan because the software can never fully remove the orange mask. It does take some time to get familiar with the software and I would suggest that you learn all the advanced settings. It had Digital ICE, so I did not have to worry about dust specs. With that said, the V500 was pretty nice.
![epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons](https://www.filmscanner.info/Bilder/EpsonPerfectionV600_EpsonScan.jpg)
I did try to alter the height of the carrier to see if I can improve the sharpness, but that did not work.
![epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons epson perfection v500 photo scanner price comparisons](https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TS590x0~articles/1857649076/product/Epson-V600-06.jpeg)
When I compared scans with the V500, the Medium Format scans were about the same, but the Minolta was very clearly better at 35mm. The Minolta can scan Medium Format at 1200 dpi and 35mm at 2400 dpi. At the time, it seemed the V500's specs were much better than the Minolta. It wasn't a bad scanner, but I bought it to replace a 10 year old Minolta Dimage Scan Multi (a dedicated scanner).